Earlier this summer, the Post asked our readers what issues you wanted to hear candidates running for Westwood City Council to address leading up to the Nov. 7 election.
Based on that feedback, we developed a four-item questionnaire centering the issues most important to Westwood residents.
Each day this week, we’ll publish the candidates’ responses to one question. (Note: All seats on the Westwood City Council are at-large. The top two vote-getters in this race will be seated.)
Today, we’re publishing candidates’ responses to the following question:
A developer recently proposed a multi-building office project on the site of Joe D. Dennis Park on Rainbow Boulevard, as well as a neighboring green space where Westwood Christian Church used to stand. In turn, the site of the original Westwood View Elementary nearby would be converted into a public park as part of the proposal. (The city council has since approved this project.) Do you support this project and think it fits into Westwood’s long-term plan? Why or why not?
Below are the answers the Post received from candidates on this issue:
Melinda Garcia
While I am not inherently against development, several concerns arose for me regarding the now approved Rainbow Boulevard mixed-use project.
Firstly, the potential safety and increased traffic implications were not thoroughly assessed, I feel. The removal of valued green areas, including Joe D. Dennis Park and the adjacent site of the former Westwood Christian Church, raises significant concerns for me. Equally troubling is the absence of a bid process, denying other developers a chance to present alternative visions for the site. Additionally, a project of this magnitude should involve more comprehensive community input and engagement. It appears to be a long-term decision for Westwood that seems to have been made with undue haste. As we evaluate such proposals, it’s crucial to ensure they align with and further our community’s goals and cherished values. I believe in the importance of thorough evaluation, community engagement and transparency for such impactful projects.
Holly Wimer (incumbent)
The preliminary development plan and rezoning for the Karbank development was approved by the city council on Thursday, October 12th. While my vote on this project was a “No,” — as I was hoping for smaller buildings and more park space — I do hope this project will be a benefit to the city.
The Karbank family is reputable, has demonstrated responsiveness, a high level of character and builds beautiful buildings. This plan with the city is ensuring we can increase the green space and park amenities for all residents and will help the tax base and revenue.
I look forward to residents being involved in the park development process in the next couple of years as we plan for the future.
Laura Steele (incumbent)
Did not provide the Post with a response.
Tomorrow, we will publish the candidates’ responses to the final question:
Westwood is also contemplating the future of its city hall building at the corner of 47th and Rainbow. A number of scenarios have been put forward, including renovating the current building, constructing a completely new city hall or moving city hall to another location. What do you think is the best idea for the future of city hall, and how should the city proceed?
