Today, we’re publishing candidates’ responses to the following question:
Kansas lawmakers in recent years have passed legislation that allows for open enrollment in public schools, as well as pushed measures that would expand a system of tax credits for families who send their children to private schools. Supporters of such moves say they give more freedom to families in making decisions about their child’s education. Opponents see them as threats that place new and unfair burdens on public schools. Where do you stand on such measures? Do you support moves like open enrollment and school vouchers? Why or why not?
Below are the answers the Post received from candidates on the issue:
District 35
Jason Anderson (Democratic)
Public education is the foundation of our community’s success, and it must be protected. Allowing open enrollment in public schools and expanding tax credits for private education poses a serious threat to the viability of our public schools. These measures, while framed as promoting “choice,” ultimately undermine public schools by diverting critical resources to private institutions, which are not subject to the same accountability and standards.
I believe in a strong public education system that benefits all students, regardless of their background or where they live. Open enrollment risks overcrowding certain schools while underfunding others, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Tax credits for private education further widen the gap between those who can afford private schooling and those who cannot.
I oppose school vouchers and tax credits for private education. Instead, we should focus on fully funding our public schools, investing in teacher retention, and ensuring every student has access to high-quality education. As a product of public schools myself and a parent of children in public schools, I understand firsthand the importance of these institutions, and I will fight to protect them.
TJ Rose (Republican)
Did not provide the Post with a response.
